ON LANGUAGE MAKING

I Linguistics and Interlinguistics

In discussing to-day the development of artificial languages, I assume a basic acquaintance with their less important features so that we may be able to analyze more fully the latest developments in this field.

The growth of the international language movement has been accidental rather than planned, a development in which each system was based on, and remained the sole product of, the ability of its inventor and his collaborators. In fact we may say that the problem has been treated as an art rather than a science. That was inevitably so and will remain so until the subject becomes one for academic study and experiment, in which the premises of the creators of artificial languages can be tested in an objective and disinterested manner.

To-day I shall endeavour to show that the study of language-making has thrown new light on language in general; and further, I shall endeavour to show that the growth and progress of language overlaps with language-making at a certain point. In fact, I believe that language-making is not an activity moving in a vacuum but merely the anticipation of linguistic development of our ethnic languages on a new level, and I therefore propose to call it interlinguistics, that is, the study of international language. That this study has certain implications for linguistics I shall attempt to show.



The material on this page was originally provided by James Chandler. It was created by him in 1997 and was copied from his site on June 5, 2009. Some changes have been made as necessary to make it function properly on this site. He has given me permission to reproduce and display all Novial-related information on his site.

Please inform me of dead links and any other problems.

Last modified by B. R. Gilson (brg1942@gmail.com) June 8, 2009.
Sign up for your own site
 Go to the next chapter
 Go to the Table of Contents
 Back to my Novial top page
 Back to my home page


Free web hostingWeb hosting